Shopping Cart

Cart empty

How Social Factors Influence Our Selection Of Music

How Social Factors Influence Our Selection Of Music

The music trade has at all times been notoriously unpredictable, and the old A&R maxim that the cream always rises to the highest is far from a given. For anyone band that makes a residing out of their music, there are at the very least a thousand that by no means will - and the proportion of musicians that really turn out to be rich by way of their work is smaller still. There may be, nevertheless, a common feeling (if not an precise consensus) that those musicians who do make it are there because they're in a roundabout way intrinsically better than the swathes of artists left in their wake.

This is paying homage to Robert M. Pirsigs interrogation of quality - what makes something good, and is there really any goal normal by which such high quality may be measured? Most individuals would say there may be, as they'll easily tell if a band is wonderful or a bunch of expertiseless hacks - but when it comes down to it, this quantities to nothing more than personal taste and opinion. Although one can point to sure technical qualities like musicianship, structural complexity and production values, music is more than the sum of its elements - one can't dismiss the Intercourse Pistols for not having the technical genius of Mozart, no more than one can effectively rank the music of Stockhausen above or below that of Willie Nelson. Plainly in relation to music, it must be instilled with a Philosophiokay Mercury which is as intangible as it's unpredictable. The only barometer by which we can choose is whether we prefer it or not. Or is there something more?

Current history is littered with examples of works and artists that are actually considered classics (or have at least turn out to be enormously in style) which have been at first rejected offhand by talent scouts, agents or business executives. Harry Potter, Star Wars, the Beatles - all fall into this class, as does Pirsigs classic work Zen and the Art of Bike Maintenance, which was rejected 121 times. If phenomena of this magnitude may very well be neglected, then what probability do merely moderately proficient artists have of ever being observed? However, the leisure sphere is packed stuffed with artists who may never hope to be anything close to moderately talented. So does the entertainment business really know what its doing, when so many of its predicted hits fail miserably and rejected unknowns hold popping up with chart-toppers? Latest analysis would appear to suggest not.

Now that Web 2.0 is in full flight, social media networks are changing the way in which we access and perceive content. The digital music age is upon us, and the ease with which new music from unsigned bands will be obtained has created a new economic mannequin for distribution and promotion. Buzz itself is the latest buzz, and word-of-blog/IM/e mail has turn into a very powerful device for aspiring artists. Combined with the fact that single downloads now count towards a songs official chart place, the promotion and distribution cycle for new music can happen totally online. However does such bewebbed comfort make it easier to predict what will turn into a hit?

The usual method of major labels is to emulate what is already successful. On the face of it, this seems a superbly valid strategy - in case you take a lady who seems to be form of like Shania Twain, give her an album of songs that sound just-like, a similarly designed album cover, and spend the same sum of money promoting her, then certainly this new album may even be successful. Typically, nevertheless, this is just not the case - instead, another lady who possesses all these characteristics (with music of a simlar quality) appears from nowhere and goes on to enjoy a spell of pop stardom.

This method is clearly flawed, but what is the drawback? Its this - the belief that the thousands and thousands of people who purchase a selected album achieve this independently of 1 another. This is not how individuals (in the collective sense) consume music. Music is a social entity, as are the people who listen to it - it helps to define social teams, creates a sense of belonging, identity and shared experience. Treating a group of such magnitude as if it have been just a compilation of discrete models fully removes the social factors involved. Whilst a single individual, removed from social influences, may select to listen to Artist A, the same particular person in real life goes to be launched to artists through their mates, either locally or online, and can instead end up listening to Artists C and Ok, who could also be of an identical (and even inferior) quality however that is not the real point. Music might be as a lot about image as about sound.

Follow Us On